Re: Stable branches, including frameworks for Kubuntu LTS

On 5/19/26 9:19 AM, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Monday, 18 May 2026 17:44:22 Central European Summer Time Nate Graham
> wrote:
>> To help move this forward, are there any formal objections to
>> Techpaladin people (Marco, me, possibly others) creating stable branches
>> for frameworks that we would maintain by backporting bug-fixes already
>> on master to, and making releases from those branches as needed?
> 
> No objection, just note that using KDE stable branch schemes (as opposed to
> vendor branches) means that KDE stable branch rules apply, e.g. regarding
> string freezes, new features or who can decide what goes in and what doesn't.
> Doesn't look like that's going to be a problem here, but it's an aspect
> learned from the "enterprise3" vendor branches back then which hadn't been
> mentioned here yet I think. Ie. if you need to control the rules, a vendor
> branch is probably the better choice.

Absolutely. Like I mentioned, the intention is definitely to only 
backport bug fixes already on master. No end-run around the normal rules 
for stable branches

In the very rare cases that a UI change, string change, or feature is 
requested to be backported, we'd go through all the proper procedures. 
But I don't see this as a particularly likely outcome in the first place.

Nate