Re: Changing CI builds to RelWithDebInfo from Debug
Albert Vaca Cintora <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:30:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.releases,gmane.comp.kde.devel.general,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma,gmane.comp.kde.devel.frameworks |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAQViEudEULxd=dmKOc--nXH0wJ7aLbYuGyK90BB9JuFewgm9g@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000d65c510657ab01f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Seems like a good idea to me. Since trying it is cheap, I would say we do that and compare both size and CI time. I expect the compile time to go up but the test time to go down (thanks to the optimized code), so it's hard to predict if overall we will gain or lose in total time. We can decide if it's worth it when we see the difference in size and time. --000000000000d65c510657ab01f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Seems like a good idea to me. Since tryin= g it is cheap, I would say we do that and compare both size=C2=A0and CI tim= e. I expect the compile time to go up but the test time to go down (thanks = to the optimized code), so it's hard to predict if overall we will gain= or lose in total time. We can decide if it's worth it when we see the = difference in size and time.</div></div> --000000000000d65c510657ab01f2--