Re: Re: Decommissioning Qt 5 CI
David Redondo <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:30:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core,gmane.comp.kde.releases |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, 28. Juli 2026, 23:36 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > El dimarts, 28 de juliol del 2026, a les 13:20:56 (Hora d=E2=80=99estiu d= =E2=80=99Europa=20 > central), Nicolas Fella va escriure: > > On 28/07/2026 12:52, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > Hi all, > > >=20 > > > For some time now Qt 5 has been in extended maintenance / support, > > > which Iif my understanding is correct has now come to an end. > > >=20 > > > Accordingly, given that all of our applications have now had a > > > substantial amount of time to migrate, and plenty of notice that CI > > > would be withdrawn eventually, i'd like to proceed with withdrawing CI > > > support for Qt 5. > > >=20 > > > This will free up valuable space on the CI nodes and allow us to > > > remove an image that is under very minimal, if any, maintenance. > > >=20 > > > Please let me know if there are any objections. > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > for applications I agree to drop Qt5 CI. The few usages that are left > > either already have Qt6 CI, or are more or less dead projects. > >=20 > > That said, we have a number of (Plasma) components that we still build > > for Qt5 for (external) application compatibility (breeze, > > plasma-integration, etc). So far we have not made a decision to stop > > doing that, and I'd rather not lose CI for those. That doesn't mean we > > need Qt5 CI in the current form. Could we use a distribution image with > > Qt and the few necessary libraries/frameworks baked in? That would be a > > much smaller image and easier to maintain than the current suse-qt515 > > image. >=20 > Does the code of those repos change in qt5 related areas? >=20 > Trying to understand what we want CI for here: > * Potentially new qt5 code builds with old qt5/gcc distros? > * Non changing qt5 code builds new gcc/stuff from distros? >=20 breeze, oxygen and plasma-integration is * new qt5 code builds on current distros it changes as the qt6 code changes. The goal is that qt5 and qt6 applicatio= ns look and feel the same. =46or breeze and oxygen the same code base is compiled twice, once with qt6= and once with qt5. plasma-integration has copies of the code for qt5 and qt6 because the ifdef= 'ery became a bit too much. Non changing qt5 code that I can think of is kwayland-integration which is = an implementation detail of kf5/plasma5 but we provide in plasma6 to keep kf5 apps working.=20 Cheers, David > Cheers, > Albert >=20 > >=20 > > Cheers > >=20 > > Nico >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20