Re: Hard crash in QFileDialog (Qt/WinFree)
Christian Ehrlicher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.cygwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Angus Leeming schrieb: > Ralf Habacker wrote: > >>> When MinGW wouldn't be so slow > > >> the linker or the compiler too ? > > > Well, the compiler is slower than its linux equivalent, but not > disastrously so. The real killer is the linker. Here's some examples on > a 2.7GHz dual boot (linux, WinXP) machine > > linking qt-mt.dll under either Windows XP or linux using the mingw cross > compiler --- ~15 minutes. > linking LyX 1.3.6 cvs (which requires qt-mt.dll) under either OS --- ~15 > minutes. > linking LyX 1.4.x cvs on linux --- 61minutes!!! LyX 1.4.x makes very > heavy use of Boost's template-heavy code. > linking LyX 1.4.x cvs on Windows --- run out of virtual memory. Which > given that I have 512MB + 1024MB swap is a bit rude :-) > > Admittedly, these latter two had full debug info, but I only tried the > once. I'll try again sometime in the future and this time I'll compile > without -g. But first I want to get LyX 1.3.6 out of the door. You don't need to test more - I know about the problems and talked with mingw-users about it. Currently I'm trying to get a working cross compiler running under linux which isn't as easy as I thought. There I hope to find the answer why ld/win32 needs that much memory (which is the most problematic thing). Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCrH+ynNKwkgf+zVMRAklqAJ4ibQqJpk9JfIL0H2/FdDwW9tZMcQCfaJ5b Ys2wckEskDe7mehjl6f+Q6c= =/5GI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----