Re: note on further KDE on cygwin development
Chris January <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:12:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.cygwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22/09/05, Ralf Habacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > in the last time there were some exiting and faster alternatives to the KDE on > cygwin port in using colinux (http://www.colinux.org) and xming > (http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Xming) the win32 based X-Server. Because they > provide are much easier way to run KDE application on windows, I thought > about the sense of the KDE on cygwin port, especially because a native KDE 4 > port to windows is not far away. The result of this thoughs are that I will > stop further development of the kde-cygwin port because of: > > - a side effect of the the ongoing transition to KDE 4 is that the releases > kde svn is partial unstable (for example the autotool build system), which > require much more work to fix, I unfortunally don't have. > > - there are trademark issues (initiated by trolltech) about the gpl'ed native > qt3-port, which makes further development for me personally somewhat > unsecure. (I hope that this effects noone other working on the native qt3 > port) > > - The required time of porting and supporting the KDE on cygwin port may be > better used helping the KDE 4 windows port. > > As summary I think that KDE on cygwin and the native gpl'ed qt3 port had > opened a wide door for getting a native KDE 4 on windows. But as anything in > this limited world has it's live time, KDE on cygwin' live time seems to be > over. > > I like to thank all who had contributed to this project and worked hard to > make it possible. Everytime I think about what was reached, i'm very > impressed how the open source movement works. > > -- Keep up the good work. Hi Ralf, It's been great to work (albeit somewhat sporadically) with you first on KDE for Cygwin and later the GPL'd Qt port. I can understand your reasons for stopping with kde-cygwin and I look forward to a true native KDE 4 port on Windows. It's a shame the Qt port effort had been marred by the trademark issues and I must take some responsibility for that in pushing for the 're-branding' of the project. I hope that the legal issues do not affect you personally. Do I understand that you will be working on KDE 4 yourself or have you had your fill of KDE development for the time being? Regards, Chris