Re: Fixes for KPat Forty & Eight patience game

El dilluns, 20 de juliol de 2020, a les 9:05:26 CEST, Ian Wadham va escriure:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> > On 18 Jul 2020, at 5:38 am, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > El divendres, 17 de juliol de 2020, a les 8:35:23 CEST, Ian Wadham va escriure:
> >> 
> >>> On 17 Jul 2020, at 6:38 am, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> El divendres, 10 de juliol de 2020, a les 7:38:40 CEST, Ian Wadham va escriure:
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Good news. In brief, I have found two or three causes of the 10 bugs listed in
> >>>> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=kpat%20forty%20eight.
> >>>> 
> >>>> However, I am going to need help from an expert with a knowledge of the KPat code to work out the most appropriate patches.
> >>>> 
> <snip>
> >>>> I will also need help to get patches committed, when they are ready, because I do not have access to or knowledge of the newer KDE Community repositories and procedures.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Unfortunately I don't think we have many KPat experts around anymore, Shlomi and Fabian are the two that did changes to somewhat core parts lately.
> >> 
> >> I was hoping Parker Coates might be able to advise us. I did see a post on kde-games-devel from him not long ago.
> >> 
> >>> My suggestion would be for you to put the patch as a Merge Request in invent.kde.org
> >> 
> >> I have looked at that online, but I am really not up to it, Albert. The last review tool I had anything to do with was ReviewBoard and I have not committed or checked out anything for about five years. I have been keeping an eye on things using “anongit" and sometimes offering suggestions or a “diff -u” style patch (not a “git diff” style one). But as of now I cannot even figure out how to get a read-only git clone of KPat from invent.kde.org.
> > 
> > git clone https://invent.kde.org/games/kpat.git
> 
> Thanks, Albert, I was able to get a local git clone, as above.
> 
> As you may have seen, I have sorted out the Forty & Eight bugs on bugs.kde.org and eliminated some duplicates. I have also finalised my changes to KPat and am doing final testing on my Apple OSX KDE 4 version of KPat. One patch is tested and ready to present, but I am not able to test it on the KF5 version of KPat.
> 
> I have the change on a branch in my local clone, but have not committed it, nor written a commit message there.
> 
> Attached is a patch in “git diff” format to show you what I mean. It fixes the illegal move bug in kpat/patsolve/fortyeightsolver.cpp.
> 
> I have taken the liberty of adding some comments to explain what is going on in the code and make it less cryptic. Also I have re-written the conditional code for multi-card moves, to use multi-character identifiers and make it more readable. I could have fixed the whole thing with one line and no comments, but that is not how I like to work… :-)
> 
> So how would you like to proceed from here?
> 
> <snip>
> >>> and that way we all can have a look at it and maybe try to understand it together.
> >> 
> >> Indeed. I look forward to that.
> 
> <snip>
> >> I think the best I can do, over the next week or so, is first to tidy up the bug reports in:
> >> 
> >> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=kpat%20forty%20eight,
> >> 
> >> flagging duplicate reports, collating test cases, etc. Then I can add my patches as attachments to whichever are the “main” reports (with appropriate comments). Then maybe links to that work in Bugzilla could help kick off any discussion on a merge request.
> 
> Close to finishing that.
> 
> >> What do you think, Albert?
> > 
> > I guess that could work, not optimal, but better than nothing :)
> 
> So how would you like to proceed from here, using the attached fix for https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302140 as a trial?

The patch seems reasonable (from the i've no idea what you're really talking about) scenario :D

Do you have a numbered hand in which to reproduce the issue?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers,
> Ian W.
> 
>