Re: Dropping Qt5 CI Support at the End of September 2025 - Sunsetting Qt 5

Christoph Cullmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.general
Message-ID <otEdRGnb0bJMLGVXYd--C92k0BKSB28LD4FY16wwGFs8J-p92rD1TCTpjkzqWYS6BVOi2o05XO2U_Oig-Rl-UycvGtdd3z_nvJlcWu3dQaQ=@cullmann.io>
Hi,

shall we then pull the plug for Qt 5?

Should I create an issue to coordinate that?

Greetings
Christoph



On Sunday, December 28th, 2025 at 18:07, Christoph Cullmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> 

> 

> Hi,
> 

> > El diumenge, 28 de desembre del 2025, a les 8:58:34 (Hora estàndard d’Europa
> > central), Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> 

> > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 11:20 AM Albert Astals Cid [email protected] wrote:
> 

> > > > El dissabte, 27 de desembre del 2025, a les 22:18:55 (Hora estàndard
> > > > d’Europa
> 

> > > > central), Christoph Cullmann va escriure:
> 

> > > > > Hi,
> 

> > > > > given we soon start 2026: Would it be time to sunset the Qt 5 stuff on
> > > > > invent?
> 

> > > > In July we said it would be in September and there was not a huge uproar,
> > > > so
> > > > doing it in January 2026 (6 months later than what we said) should be more
> > > > than enough.
> 

> > > > Doing it == "closing the remaining Qt5 CI" and that's it i guess?
> 

> > > > Or is there something else that needs to be removed?
> 

> > > We'd also stop tracking trunk_kf5 / stable_kf5 for translation purposes as
> > > well?
> 

> > That should come as a decision to archive the projects.
> 

> 

> Should that not also happen for projects that still continue to exist,
> like e.g. Frameworks with KF6 releases that now no longer need the trunk_kf5 / stable_kf5
> 

> translation updates, as we do no new releases (beside perhaps a security backport)?
> 

> Greetings
> Christoph
> 

> > Cheers,
> > Albert
> 

> > > > Cheers,
> 

> > > > Albert
> 

> > > Cheers,
> > > Ben
> 

> > > > > (beside the Qt patch collection)
> 

> > > > > Greetings
> > > > > Christoph
> 

> > > > > On Thursday, July 3rd, 2025 at 21:33, Albert Astals Cid [email protected]
> 

> > > > wrote:
> 

> > > > > > El dijous, 3 de juliol del 2025, a les 16:52:49 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa
> 

> > > > > > central), Neal Gompa va escriure:
> 

> > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 6:31 PM Albert Astals Cid [email protected]
> 

> > > > wrote:
> 

> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> 

> > > > > > > > While this has been discussed in various forums, it has not yet
> 

> > > > been
> 

> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > main focus of any conversation.
> 

> > > > > > > > We are planning to drop support for Qt5 CI on invent.kde.org at
> 

> > > > the
> 

> > > > > > > > end of
> > > > > > > > September 2025.
> 

> > > > > > > > If you are still using Qt5 you have 3 months to move to Qt6 or you
> 

> > > > can
> 

> > > > > > > > try
> > > > > > > > to convince the powers that you need more time with a really good
> > > > > > > > reason.
> > > > > > > > Does this mean we've effectively stopped working on the Qt5 patch
> > > > > > > > collection and we're going to EOL the 24.08-qt5 runtime for
> 

> > > > Flatpak in
> 

> > > > > > > > September?
> 

> > > > > > We do not have CI for the patch collection.
> 

> > > > > > I will [try to[ continue doing the rebases for the patch-collection
> 

> > > > until
> 

> > > > > > Qt 5.15.19 gets released next year.
> 

> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Albert
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 343 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail

wrsEARYKAG0FgmlZcM8JEM1fs5FLcYVCRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp
b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmc7+QGMuYLwUm/SUkZl/GhRQsEAuvYlznQUhrNe
FzpLzxYhBO1uxDUBKKYjabTl981fs5FLcYVCAAArGAEA4yWK4EH3H6vR6dwW
MMPuDE1UEKVhN/XBb0J00LvzZIUBANA2CXgpSMO+4t1z8OYTy7ixg6KCmBEx
4aKt7WfXfVoM
=TWQ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.