Re: [RFC] Mandatory user doc in KDE review/incubation checklist
Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:44:31 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | pusling.com internet technologies |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-01-16, Johnny Jazeix <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I'm not sure if the state is bad because the website was not working > or if we just don't care enough about the user documentation. > If it's because we don't give enough attention to it, then yes, it > will be useless > to mandate this step as, even if it is done in the beginning, it will > quickly become outdated. I think we as developers have other fish to fry and other cats to whip and/or skin and we don't have a dedicated documentation creating team. For me it is mostly just "should I fix a crash or write some documentation" - or "should I make this ui simpler or improve documentation for the old ui" We have quite many apps where the 'main things' shouldn't need documentation. Exceptions are - games where the rules aren't obvious or otherwise well-known - chess is well known - kblackbox is not obvious nor well-known - Things that actually needs some knowledge to use. /Sune