Re: KDE and packageurl

El dijous, 5 de març del 2026, a les 1:03:45 (Hora estàndard d’Europa 
central), Aleix Pol va escriure:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 5:46 PM Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > At FOSDEM I talked with someone that is working on packageurl and he
> > suggested it would be nice if KDE adopted it.
> > 
> > What is package url?
> > 
> > "PURL introduces a standardized URL-based syntax that uniquely identifies
> > software packages"
> > 
> > Example:
> >   pkg:deb/debian/[email protected]?arch=i386&distro=jessie
> > 
> > https://packageurl.org/
> > https://tc54.org/purl/
> > https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec/blob/main/README.md
> > 
> > I guess one should say something like
> > 
> >   pkg:kde/[email protected]?qualifiers
> > 
> > And then for qualifiers we would have to think what to do, do we care only
> > about tarballs? Or do we want to include all the binary packages we
> > support? I guess if it has to be "unique" it should include the binary
> > packages too.
> > 
> > Do we see any value in adopting it?
> 
> From a Plasma Discover standpoint, we have been using appstream urls
> to identify apps. Uses of packages themselves in the software are
> slowly getting faded out because they are of little use to end-users.
> https://freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-AppStream-Misc-URIHandl
> er.html
> 
> In the end, for apps there's normally only one version that matters
> which is the stable one and one architecture that matters which is the
> one you are running.
> 
> It could make sense to offer such package urls I guess, but I don't
> really know where though :D. KDE Neon?

I think one place that was mentioned is so that folks can univocally point to 
packages in all the SBOM thing (and possibly vulnerabilities too).

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Best,
> Aleix