Re: Separate some back-end from Spectacle into a library
David Edmundson <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:19:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGeFrHD9oDgCEkPdVAezL7BPZGoZ0K2zP9CGMOWx=h9OoB9KKg@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000000957bb0656e5e0ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" There's nothing inherently wrong with just copy/pasting when it's a quite small amount of code in 1-5 apps. If things get beyond that, then sure, a library makes sense. Or if it ever becomes a massive amount of code. There is a coding guidelines about repeated code, but every coding guidelines has an equal and opposite guideline. It's all about tradeoffs. Right now I need selling on what the problem we're fixing is. Also, out of curiosity, what's the app? Ideally we should be pushing the portal API where possible, though I understand there are limitations. David On Mon, 15 Jun 2026, 16:49 Igor Mironchik, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. > > I'd like to make a request to separate some back-end from Spectacle into > a library. At least ImagePlatformKWin.h functionality may be reused by > other developers on KDE platform for some third-party screen capturing. > In can of move KDE to Wayland only this can be useful, at least for me :) > > This should not be a separate repository but in CMake should be splitted > back-end in some library. Hm, and an option for building back-end only > could be very great. :) > > What do you think? > > Thank you. > > --0000000000000957bb0656e5e0ff Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto">There's nothing inherently wrong wi= th just copy/pasting when it's a quite small amount of code in 1-5 apps= .=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto= ">If things get beyond that, then sure, a library makes sense. Or if it eve= r becomes a massive amount of code.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div d= ir=3D"auto">There is a coding guidelines about repeated code, but every cod= ing guidelines has an equal and opposite guideline. It's all about trad= eoffs.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Right now I= need selling on what the problem we're fixing is.=C2=A0</div><div dir= =3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Also, out of curiosity, what's th= e app? Ideally we should be pushing the portal API where possible, though I= understand there are limitations.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div di= r=3D"auto">David=C2=A0</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir= =3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, 15 Jun 2026, 16:49 Igor Mironchik, &l= t;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"nore= ferrer">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class= =3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= ing-left:1ex">Hello.<br> <br> I'd like to make a request to separate some back-end from Spectacle int= o <br> a library. At least ImagePlatformKWin.h functionality may be reused by <br> other developers on KDE platform for some third-party screen capturing. <br= > In can of move KDE to Wayland only this can be useful, at least for me :)<b= r> <br> This should not be a separate repository but in CMake should be splitted <b= r> back-end in some library. Hm, and an option for building back-end only <br> could be very great. :)<br> <br> What do you think?<br> <br> Thank you.<br> <br> </blockquote></div></div> --0000000000000957bb0656e5e0ff--