Re: Decommissioning Qt 5 CI

El dimarts, 28 de juliol del 2026, a les 13:20:56 (Hora d=E2=80=99estiu d=
=E2=80=99Europa=20
central), Nicolas Fella va escriure:
> On 28/07/2026 12:52, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > For some time now Qt 5 has been in extended maintenance / support,
> > which Iif my understanding is correct has now come to an end.
> >=20
> > Accordingly, given that all of our applications have now had a
> > substantial amount of time to migrate, and plenty of notice that CI
> > would be withdrawn eventually, i'd like to proceed with withdrawing CI
> > support for Qt 5.
> >=20
> > This will free up valuable space on the CI nodes and allow us to
> > remove an image that is under very minimal, if any, maintenance.
> >=20
> > Please let me know if there are any objections.
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> for applications I agree to drop Qt5 CI. The few usages that are left
> either already have Qt6 CI, or are more or less dead projects.
>=20
> That said, we have a number of (Plasma) components that we still build
> for Qt5 for (external) application compatibility (breeze,
> plasma-integration, etc). So far we have not made a decision to stop
> doing that, and I'd rather not lose CI for those. That doesn't mean we
> need Qt5 CI in the current form. Could we use a distribution image with
> Qt and the few necessary libraries/frameworks baked in? That would be a
> much smaller image and easier to maintain than the current suse-qt515
> image.

Does the code of those repos change in qt5 related areas?

Trying to understand what we want CI for here:
 * Potentially new qt5 code builds with old qt5/gcc distros?
 * Non changing qt5 code builds new gcc/stuff from distros?

Cheers,
  Albert

>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> Nico