Re: Re: Decommissioning Qt 5 CI
David Redondo <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:47:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2026, 17:22 schrieb Ingo Kl=C3=B6cker: > On Dienstag, 28. Juli 2026 23:36:20 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit Alb= ert=20 Astals=20 > Cid wrote: > > El dimarts, 28 de juliol del 2026, a les 13:20:56 (Hora d=E2=80=99estiu= d=E2=80=99Europa > > central), Nicolas Fella va escriure: > > > That said, we have a number of (Plasma) components that we still build > > > for Qt5 for (external) application compatibility (breeze, > > > plasma-integration, etc). So far we have not made a decision to stop > > > doing that, and I'd rather not lose CI for those. That doesn't mean we > > > need Qt5 CI in the current form. Could we use a distribution image wi= th > > > Qt and the few necessary libraries/frameworks baked in? That would be= a > > > much smaller image and easier to maintain than the current suse-qt515 > > > image. > >=20 > > Does the code of those repos change in qt5 related areas? > >=20 > > Trying to understand what we want CI for here: > > * Potentially new qt5 code builds with old qt5/gcc distros? > > * Non changing qt5 code builds new gcc/stuff from distros? >=20 > Additionally to Albert's questions I don't understand why distros that st= ill=20 > need Qt 5 builds of breeze and plasma-integration cannot simply build the= =20 > latest released versions that support(ed) Qt 5. Why do they need the late= st=20 > and greatest breeze and plasma-integration for the remaining Qt 5 apps wh= ich=20 > probably haven't seen a release in years? Does plasma-integration need to= =20 > match the version of Plasma? >=20 > Regards, > Ingo >=20 We did this with Plasma 5 and Qt 4 things. =46or Plasma 6 we decided that we want applications to look and behave the = same=20 no matter if they use Qt 5 and Qt6. To the user Qt5 vs. Qt6 makes no differ= ence=20 and they would be confused or file a bug if some applications randomly look= and=20 behave differently. =46or example single click vs. double click which was changed in Plasma 6.0 or breeze which received user visible changes since 6.0. Cheers, David