Re: KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master + stable) (11 August 2026)

Nate Graham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/12/26 11:42 PM, Volker Krause wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 August 2026 21:36:04 Central European Summer Time Nate Graham
> wrote:
>> It also breaks nightly Flatpak builds, since there's no nightly Flatpak
>> runtime yet.
> 
> How many of those do we really have though, and how many of those actually
> need unreleased Frameworks and can't also support the previous release?

Somewhere between zero and very few — because without a Flatpak runtime 
that includes master of Frameworks, apps with Flatpak manifests that 
want to depend on that is a literal an error condition, not just a bad idea.

My point is that we can't even consider making it potentially acceptable 
for apps to depend on master of Frameworks without a nightly master 
Flatpak runtime.


>> Though if we had that, the app contribution docs for a drive-by
>> contributor could be collapsed into "run this flatpak-builder command".
>> For the past few months I've been building and testing changes to KDE
>> apps by building them as Flatpaks, and it's actually been a really nice
>> experience overall.
> 
> Absolutely! Throwing new app contributors needlessly down the kdesrc-build
> rabbit hole is not an ideal experience, we can do a lot better. See attached
> screenshot as a sneak peek on an Akademy talk demo that'll hopefully work,
> pushing this even further :)

Sounds exciting!


Nate
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.