Re: KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master + stable) (11 August 2026)
Volker Krause <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | KDE |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Donnerstag, 13. August 2026 15:58:25 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Nate Graham wrote: > On 8/12/26 11:42 PM, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Wednesday, 12 August 2026 21:36:04 Central European Summer Time Nate > > Graham> > > wrote: > >> It also breaks nightly Flatpak builds, since there's no nightly Flatpak > >> runtime yet. > > > > How many of those do we really have though, and how many of those actually > > need unreleased Frameworks and can't also support the previous release? > > Somewhere between zero and very few — because without a Flatpak runtime > that includes master of Frameworks, apps with Flatpak manifests that > want to depend on that is a literal an error condition, not just a bad idea. > > My point is that we can't even consider making it potentially acceptable > for apps to depend on master of Frameworks without a nightly master > Flatpak runtime. Given this wouldn't just be a problem for Flatpak, I'd say we shouldn't even consider making this acceptable at all :) Regards, Volker
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHkEABECADkWIQQAnu3FVHA48KjZ07R/lszWTRLSRwUCan8xJxsUgAAAAAAEAA5t YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMSwyLDIACgkQf5bM1k0S0keRKQCffWd9EBvHuVV0qTwLk4iv niAPaegAn1sAlZNgXESwt77vdvpBLQ0urJKj =XKOV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----