Re: KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master + stable) (11 August 2026)

Volker Krause <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.general
Organization KDE
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Donnerstag, 13. August 2026 15:58:25 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Nate 
Graham wrote:
> On 8/12/26 11:42 PM, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12 August 2026 21:36:04 Central European Summer Time Nate
> > Graham> 
> > wrote:
> >> It also breaks nightly Flatpak builds, since there's no nightly Flatpak
> >> runtime yet.
> > 
> > How many of those do we really have though, and how many of those actually
> > need unreleased Frameworks and can't also support the previous release?
> 
> Somewhere between zero and very few — because without a Flatpak runtime
> that includes master of Frameworks, apps with Flatpak manifests that
> want to depend on that is a literal an error condition, not just a bad idea.
> 
> My point is that we can't even consider making it potentially acceptable
> for apps to depend on master of Frameworks without a nightly master
> Flatpak runtime.

Given this wouldn't just be a problem for Flatpak, I'd say we shouldn't even 
consider making this acceptable at all :)

Regards,
Volker
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHkEABECADkWIQQAnu3FVHA48KjZ07R/lszWTRLSRwUCan8xJxsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMSwyLDIACgkQf5bM1k0S0keRKQCffWd9EBvHuVV0qTwLk4iv
niAPaegAn1sAlZNgXESwt77vdvpBLQ0urJKj
=XKOV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.