Re: Scripting update

On Friday 19 July 2002 20:01, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> Hmm, what if we REMOVE the dcop interfaces from the ktexteditor interfaces,
> but provide there a "that methodes must be dcopified" list for the
> implementators and only provide Document#??? and View#??? dcop interfaces
> in the kate part implementation (numbered with the documentNumber() and
> viewNumber() which are unique than).
>
> What would we solve:
> - only Document and View interfaces, much cleaner and easier to handle in
> the apps and in the dcop scripts
>
> What would we drop:
> - that the implementators of the ktexteditor interfaces mustn't worry about
> the dcop stuff, but the win in usability would be much greater in my eyes,
> and it would be no BIC change.
>

I'm for that. The logical objects would be
app
mainwindow
document*
view*
fileselector
filelist

and so on

The only bad thing is that providing them for free through KTextEditor is 
nice...

-anders