Re: Scripting update - News flash

On Saturday 20 July 2002 10:36, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> Yes, but the new naming is at least unique and shows to which document/view
> the interface belongs, the current interface nummer must not mach the
> corresponding view/document number.

Well, wouldn't it be better to have an optional id # in the interfaces CTOR's?
Or would that be BIC?

/me starts hating the BC police:(

If having the setID method is the only way to ensure that an interface has a 
sane name, at least just make the name 
"<interfacename>#<(document|view)number>", so that constructing the correct 
string is easy and safe.

On a side note, since all those interface classes are basically all the same, 
wouldn't it be possible to use a base class for them?

-anders