Re: Google Summer of Code: Implement support for OASIS XLIFF 1.1 in KBabel
Nicolas Goutte <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:28:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kbabel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 30 June 2005 20:23, Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > Dňa St 29. Jún 2005 17:06 Asgeir Frimannsson napísal: > > On 6/29/05, Stanislav Visnovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dňa Wednesday 29 of June 2005 02:10 Asgeir Frimannsson napísal: > > > > I would like, if feasible, to do the development in a QT4 > > > > environment, so I'll spend a few days now first trying to port it to > > > > QT4. If that works, I'll branch it from there and start working on > > > > implementing XLIFF support. If however the porting is too complicated > > > > (I'm not *that* familiar with QT yet..) I'll go with QT3.. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts or help (KDE4 porting anyone?) on the above issues would > > > > be greatly appreciated! > > > > > > Basically, QTextEdit API has changed completely again. That will be the > > > biggest problem. > > > > > > IMO we should create a branch for KBabel for Qt4. I would like to help > > > you with porting. > > > > Sounds good! So maybe we can do something like: > > > > 1) We create a kbabel4 branch under /branches/work/ (or import it into > > /branches/work/kde4/kdesdk/kbabel?) - I'll leave this to you... > > IMO we should move to /branches/work/kde4/kdesdk/kbabel, where it belongs. > Could you do that? I'm not sure, maybe whole kdesdk should be imported > there first. I have just noticed that branches/work/kde4 has a merging script. So if we are starting to modify on branches/work/kde4/kdesdk/kbabel, it will menas that kdesdk cannot be merged by this script. So perhaps the main development should be in another branch (after KBabel has been converted roughly to Qt4). > > > 2) After the initial port, I create a kbabel4-xliff branch under > > /branches/work - and do the main part of my project here So I suppose that this option should be chosen. Have a nice day! > > 3) Depending on the success of the project we can then merge this back > > into the kde4 branch. > > > > I did a quick test, and got libkbabelcommon compiling without very > > much trouble (mostly QString/QStringList changes). > > I would expect that. > > Stano > _______________________________________________ > kbabel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kbabel