Re: running different version from its build directory?
Kevin Funk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5009570.XiI2WgNQPh@kerberos> |
On Saturday, 28 September 2019 11:15:42 CEST René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for suggestions/best-practices on how to do safe test runs of a > newer KDevelop version from its build directory or else a "destroot" (e.g. > 5.4.3 with 5.3.2 installed)? Heya, Running from the build directory is not easily doable; as the libs + plugins built by KDevelop are not being placed in a common sub-directory [1]. Could be be fixed by adding some more CMake logic, but that needs to be implemented & tested, etc.. I'm not sure what's the problem with the traditional way of installing KDevelop into a separate prefix (-> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=...), setting up PATH/QT_PLUGIN_PATH/LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH on macOS) and running the specific kdevelop binary then? That always worked fine. Also see: https://community.kde.org/KDevelop/HowToCompile_v5#3._Run_KDevelop Regards, Kevin > I guess I could make an AppImage but I have no idea what the associated > learning curve and overhead are. As you indicated, that's overkill. There's a much simpler solution. > Thanks, > R. [1] Hint: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.12/prop_tgt/ RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY.html & friends -- Kevin Funk | [email protected] | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQQ2TvpfY5VykH05KZnGTPVrE8rOXQUCXY8uXAAKCRDGTPVrE8rO XVQKAJ0ZMYrY0G+nCxGSO5EJ4z8zFhuJCgCdH5Y87jHlCwGpKBFlVLbjp6icpGw= =xi4o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----