Re: running different version from its build directory?

Kevin Funk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop
Message-ID <2103561.TGHasx0LUx@kerberos>
On Saturday, 28 September 2019 13:33:31 CEST René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Kevin Funk wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > I'm not sure what's the problem with the traditional way of installing
> > KDevelop into a separate prefix (-> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=...), setting
> > up
> > PATH/QT_PLUGIN_PATH/LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH on macOS) and
> > running the specific kdevelop binary then? That always worked fine.
> 
> Nothing wrong, probably, I just didn't think of that. I build with full
> rpath info on Linux (it's the default on Mac) so I shouldn't have to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'd have to figure out how to let Qt look for plugins in
> an additional directory though.

Hint: QT_PLUGIN_PATH

Regards,
Kevin

> R.


-- 
Kevin Funk | [email protected] | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQQ2TvpfY5VykH05KZnGTPVrE8rOXQUCXY+YnQAKCRDGTPVrE8rO
XexFAJ95KTMK024GcCZ7KNwXS4tGqMT6owCgnrFk8s5HHDEH7RrJArjItzP92og=
=WmvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.