Re: Bumping min. requirements to Qt 5.8 & KF 5.50 for KDevelop 5.6?
Heinz Wiesinger <pprkut-mrRB/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 21:33:12 CET Milian Wolff wrote: > On Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 00:32:24 CET Sven Brauch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 15:52:35 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > Are the KDevelop maintainers fine with KDevelop 5.6 reaching only users > > > via > > > packaged distribution no longer on Ubuntu LTS 18.04? Like, hoping at the > > > time of KDevelop 5.6 (surely post 20.04) they have mostly jumped to the > > > then latest LTS version? > > > > as mentioned in the RR already, I don't see a big issue with this. In my > > experience over the years listening to user questions on forum.kde.org and > > on IRC, almost all of the people with old Ubuntu LTS are at work and > > simply > > want to use an up-to-date KDevelop. They are completely happy with the > > AppImage. The maybe-mismatching icon theme of this one application is not > > the level of pain this user group operates at. ;) > > I agree. I'm personally even OK with requiring 5.12 or something like that. > That said, is there an overview somewhere to check the version of a package > across different distributions? That would make it easier for us to check > what we are doing here. Is LTS 18.04 the only somewhat recent distro that's > going to "miss" us? There's https://repology.org/project/qt/versions, it's a long list though :) Grs, Heinz
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABEIAB0WIQQRpqSSOxrcqQ33x62nXtwz5SpGygUCXkQXCgAKCRCnXtwz5SpG ygKnAP9Qtqi2juuF57y4xIDqudVCdhTnQ3HgJ0/0OuFNSSpZvAD9FdnB1ZGB4w/J usjXXdwk0NznaQzpFl9n3yN8rmqKAKQ= =tQlV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----