Re: Bumping min. requirements to Qt 5.8 & KF 5.50 for KDevelop 5.6?

Aleix Pol <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop
Message-ID <CACcA1Rq3XbQfhbhhxB0bypUAL4eDRvRQ_DF3d1D=ouKjwederA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:52 PM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as part of the feature patch "Show problem descriptions as inline notes at the
> end of the line" ( https://invent.kde.org/kde/kdevelop/merge_requests/92 )
> there would be the need to bump minimal required versions to KF 5.50 (and thus
> implicit also to Qt 5.8), to be able to use the KTextEditor API for the inline
> notes.
>
> Doing some #ifdef would be possible, but also means more work, as e.g. the
> changes to UI files need to be made in code then, as UI files do not support
> any if-kf-version-is-xxyz-do-this-otherwise-that.
>
> So the questions are if the requirements are bumped to Qt 5.8 & KF 5.50:
> a) are there any contributors who would be left out ?
> b) is there any bigger size of user group left out who are on older platforms,
> who would prefer not to use the appimage, for better integration?
>
> This might mostly affect people who are on Ubuntu LTS 18.04:
>     Ubuntu LTS 18.04: Qt 5.9, KF 5.44  (FAILS TO MEET REQ)
>                20.04: Qt 5.12, KF 5.66
>     openSUSE Leap 15.1: Qt 5.9, KF 5.55
>     Debian Buster: Qt 5.11, KF 5.54
>     <fill-in your favoured distribution here>
>
> So, is there any current contributor affected?
> Are the KDevelop maintainers fine with KDevelop 5.6 reaching only users via
> packaged distribution no longer on Ubuntu LTS 18.04? Like, hoping at the time
> of KDevelop 5.6 (surely post 20.04) they have mostly jumped to the then latest
> LTS version?
>
> Would be good to have this answered by upcoming WE, this being a blocker
> currently to the nice feature in that review request.
>
> Cheers
> Friedrich
>
>

+1 to adopting latest LTS.

Thanks Friedrich!

Aleix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.