PGP signing commits
Martin Bednar <martin-bVyCAMn5I1PtwjQa/[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:12:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kdevelop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--nextPartEaPTPPl9SIuqEK_UWTg1dg Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Martin Bednar <martin-bVyCAMn5I1PtwjQa/[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: PGP signing commits Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <d5dYUs89Rt-aH5Psi3HFYw-bVyCAMn5I1PtwjQa/[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, On the topic of requiring GPG signed commits, opened here: https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/-/merge_requests/896#note_1519822 I believe this warrants a wider discussion. I'm all for it, as in anything going into master should be PGP signed. I am however worried that it creates yet another hurdle for one off contributions, as we have had a few in the past few months. Any thoughts on that? Should we enforce this at gitlab level? And on a slightly related note: Anyone going to Akademy? Martin. --nextPartEaPTPPl9SIuqEK_UWTg1dg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJEEABYKADkWIQSQahp3QLKdvHTT9rcGyo/AjsPylgUCaisIkhsUgAAAAAAEAA5t YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDIACgkQBsqPwI7D8pbo6gD/blPj11mdKnXl8rSOzkKR ve1/Ht6GXS5aB1s9tQK+uJYA/3ulPb6TRIQFTmBySXo8wbaKFl3/HCqtrNsc+mV1 6eMB =Demo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPartEaPTPPl9SIuqEK_UWTg1dg--