Re: branches/work/kdepim-3.5.5+/kmail
Allen Winter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kmail,gmane.linux.debian.devel.qt-kde |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 18 March 2007 5:38:25 pm Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Saturday 17 March 2007 03:04, Allen Winter wrote: > > SVN commit 643365 by winterz: > > > > Show X-UserAgent and/or X-Mailer in the fancy header. > > I sorta like it, although it does take up space. > > Yes, we could add a config option.. but who wants > > yet-another-config-option? > > > > What do others think about it? > > For now, I will keep this only in pim+ branch. I won't move it into > > the 3.5 branch or trunk unless I get a resounding "Yes we want this" > > from testers and core devs. > > Is this relevant for 80% of our users? No, it's not even relevant for > 95% of our users. Conclusion: It must be disabled by default. > > Even for me it's mostly irrelevant. I only look at the User-Agent header > (by looking at the message source) if I want to know which version of > KMail somebody asking a question is using. > Agree. I've been using it for a couple of days now and at first it was sorta cool to see all the different MUAs out in the wild. But now it just takes up space. And I don't think it is worth a config option. Unless we do a "hidden option" in the kmailrc (not available via KMail Settings->Configure, but by hand-editing kmailrc) Sorry but this really isn't worth any further discussion or coding on my part as I am swamped with KDE4 stuff. If Ingo agrees to a hidden option, and Frank provides the patch, I will commit. -Allen _______________________________________________ KMail developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel