Re: Please whitelist all email addresses that are registered with bugs.kde.org

David Faure <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:00:19 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kmail
Organization Klaralvdalens Datakonsult.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2007 10:25, David Faure wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 August 2007, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 28 August 2007 16:19, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > > > I am not sure if I should file a bug report or write here,
> > > > but I suspect here is fine, too. I just got a bounce on my
> > > > bugs.kde.org address stating that my reply I sent via the
> > > > webform and which is CC'ed to this list is being held.
> > > > This seems _far_ from ideal.
> > >
> > > I know and this annoys me a lot because I have to accept all those
> > > messages manually. There are some rules in place for mailman to
> > > accept those messages automatically, but apparently mailman is
> > > broken or just too stupid. :-(
> > >
> > > Since a couple of weeks I'm whitelisting the email addresses
> > > whenever I have to accept one of those bug report message. So you
> > > shouldn't get any more of those "held for moderation" messages when
> > > you add a comment to an old KMail bug. Newer KMail bugs are sent to
> > > another list (kdepim-bugs) which is not moderated by me.
> >
> > I could reassign all kmail-devel bugs to kdepim-bugs (in the mysql
> > database to avoid generating a whole bunch of emails), if you want.
> 
> That does only make sense if non-subscriber posts to kdepim-bugs are not 
> moderated.

Right. I think that's the whole point of -bugs mailing-lists.
Adriaan, can you confirm that kdepim-bugs is not moderated?


-- 
David Faure, [email protected], [email protected]
KDE/KOffice developer, Qt consultancy projects
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions