Re: kofficetests validation

Cyrille Berger Skott <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

As I have said to Inge on IRC. I would agree to treat invalid ODF as release 
blockers, under the following conditions:

1) That a proper explanation on why the use of the koffice namespace is 
invalid is provided (while, it seems the openoffice namespace is acceptable)
2) There are people commited to fix the problems
3) We have an easy way to get reports on the ODF validity (aka a page which 
list which documents are saved invalid)

But I am unsure, if it is not too late in the 2.3 cycle to add this as release 
blocker, and if it should not be set as requirement for the next release.

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.