Re: kofficetests validation
Cyrille Berger Skott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 09 November 2010, Jos van den Oever wrote: > Ok, I cannot say I disagree. Just that it would be nice to have many docs > for the use-case you mention. Of course the case where we load invalid > docs and save valid ones would be interesting, but that's reaching too far > at the moment. That said, nothing prevent to have both valid and invalid version of the same document :) -- Cyrille Berger Skott