Re: KOffice Split, before or after 2.3 ?

Thorsten Zachmann <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:42:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Thomas,

On Monday, December 13, 2010 23:43:54 Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 13. December 2010 22.07.02 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > On Thursday 11. November 2010 15.27.08 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > > > Do we agree that this can be done without anyone doing any removing
> > > > > of code or dirs in the koffice svn?
> 
> Its quite unfortunate that Boudewijn removed the Krita dir and subdirs,
> which is exactly what we agreed to not happen.
> See commit r1204342
> 
> Is the agreement still valid if one side fails to follow it?

I don't see why Boudewijn is not following what was discussed. You said 
yourself they can be removed some mails back in the thread. See:

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 23:49:40 Thomas Zander wrote:
> This is not the case; I think I stated this some time ago but It can be 
> restated.
> both Kexi and Krita are too big to be without maintainer and thus they can
> be  removed. The f-office app is not too interesting outside of N900 users
> and can be removed too.

I fail to see how that would make one side not follow what was discussed.

Have a nice day,

Thorsten