Re: KOffice Split, before or after 2.3 ?
Thorsten Zachmann <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:42:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Thomas, On Monday, December 13, 2010 23:43:54 Thomas Zander wrote: > On Monday 13. December 2010 22.07.02 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > On Thursday 11. November 2010 15.27.08 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > > > Do we agree that this can be done without anyone doing any removing > > > > > of code or dirs in the koffice svn? > > Its quite unfortunate that Boudewijn removed the Krita dir and subdirs, > which is exactly what we agreed to not happen. > See commit r1204342 > > Is the agreement still valid if one side fails to follow it? I don't see why Boudewijn is not following what was discussed. You said yourself they can be removed some mails back in the thread. See: On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 23:49:40 Thomas Zander wrote: > This is not the case; I think I stated this some time ago but It can be > restated. > both Kexi and Krita are too big to be without maintainer and thus they can > be removed. The f-office app is not too interesting outside of N900 users > and can be removed too. I fail to see how that would make one side not follow what was discussed. Have a nice day, Thorsten