Re: KOffice Split, before or after 2.3 ?
Cyrille Berger Skott <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:29:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Thomas, Now that the krita removal has been cleared up. Can we know when you will respect your engagement to rename kspread, kpresenter, kivio, kplato, kchart and kformula ? I also would like to proceed with the removal of kexi as soon as possible. On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > On Monday, December 13, 2010 23:43:54 Thomas Zander wrote: > > On Monday 13. December 2010 22.07.02 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > > On Thursday 11. November 2010 15.27.08 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > > > > Do we agree that this can be done without anyone doing any > > > > > > removing of code or dirs in the koffice svn? > > > > Its quite unfortunate that Boudewijn removed the Krita dir and subdirs, > > which is exactly what we agreed to not happen. > > See commit r1204342 > > > > Is the agreement still valid if one side fails to follow it? > > I don't see why Boudewijn is not following what was discussed. You said > yourself they can be removed some mails back in the thread. See: > > On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 23:49:40 Thomas Zander wrote: > > This is not the case; I think I stated this some time ago but It can be > > restated. > > both Kexi and Krita are too big to be without maintainer and thus they > > can be removed. The f-office app is not too interesting outside of N900 > > users and can be removed too. > > I fail to see how that would make one side not follow what was discussed. > > Have a nice day, > > Thorsten > _______________________________________________ > koffice-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel -- Cyrille Berger Skott