Re: Continuing Community Issues

On Tuesday 01 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A few comments:
> 
> 1) noone will be begruged by calligra, ie koffice group B, developers for
> contributing to any other project, that include koffice group A. I know
> that Inge told you that, but I feel that it needs to be restated firmly.
> 2) noone from calligra, ie koffice group B, will interefer with any
> discussion concerning the future development of koffice group A on this
> mailing-list or on the IRC channel, as long as it does not concern the
> koffice name (and until the arbitration process has been resolved), and
> that calligra is not mentioned in a wrong way (for instance, we will react
> if someone say that calligra is only for meego), in which case we will
> only correct the wrong statement. 3) kivio (and other applications, except
> kword) have choosen to be developed in Calligra, the lead developer of
> Group A has agreed to rename those applications when forking them into
> Group A. This rename has not happen and leads to confusion. When a user
> comes asking a question about kivio, it is only logical to redirect him to
> where kivio is. If Group A had proceed to the rename of kivio, and someone
> would ask a question about the application "newnameforkivio", I would
> agree that Group B people should shut up.
And forgot to mention:
4) we will not comment on koffice group A commits, as long as they do not 
violate our copyrights.

-- 
Cyrille Berger Skott