Re: Debian packages: link squeeze/stable in repository
Jeroen van Meeuwen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kolab,gmane.comp.kde.kolab.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 11:31:28 PM Johannes Graumann wrote: > In the Debian repositories it doesn't matter whether you ask for "stable" or > "squeeze" ... the same packages are available. Makes it easy for people to > track "stable" and/or "testing" across release cycles. > We have versioned repositories, because we need multiple versions to be available for a given platform version (i.e. Kolab 2.4 vs. Kolab 3.0). On top of that, we have repository stages, with release, updates, updates-testing and development packages in each of these stages. A typical APT repository configuration includes these three parameters; - The kolab product series (i.e. kolab-2.4, kolab-3.0), - The debian platform version (i.e. squeeze, wheezy), - The repository stages (i.e. release, updates, updates-testing, development) If "squeeze" maps to "stable" today, I reckon we'll need to change "stable" to "wheezy" by the time that is released - correct? Where would such a link be made (is it simply a ln -s squeeze stable in the dists/ directory of a repository mirror?) Doesn't that make the effort quite the same, but exactly the inverse? I mean, sticking with "stable" moves one forward "automatically" (I reckon a dist-upgrade is still required) when a new distribution version is labeled stable (I suppose one needs to change "stable" to "oldstable" to continue to use the same?), sticking with "squeeze" would cause a system to continue to use the same repositories (I suppose one needs to change "squeeze" to "wheezy" to upgrade). While none of the former is set in stone exactly - I just thought it would work - I'd appreciate some thoughts on the subject from actual Debian users/sysadmins/developers; - Is it necessary to maintain the release/updates/updates-testing/development repository stages at all? - Would a default (i.e. the documented) installation better use "stable" and "testing" terminology, rather than "squeeze" and "wheezy"? Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com m: +44 74 2516 3817 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08 _______________________________________________ Kolab-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlBIj8QACgkQKN6f2pNCvwiDqwCgyHMXR4t0Ep9F4HEeuf6FAJvR DIIAoIvLcT33iRMwVk7siVzb3l05vmUS =d36T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----