Re: Debian packages: link squeeze/stable in repository

Jeroen van Meeuwen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kolab,gmane.comp.kde.kolab.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 11:31:28 PM Johannes Graumann wrote:
> In the Debian repositories it doesn't matter whether you ask for "stable" or
> "squeeze" ... the same packages are available. Makes it easy for people to
> track "stable" and/or "testing" across release cycles.
> 

We have versioned repositories, because we need multiple versions to be 
available for a given platform version (i.e. Kolab 2.4 vs. Kolab 3.0). On top 
of that, we have repository stages, with release, updates, updates-testing and 
development packages in each of these stages.

A typical APT repository configuration includes these three parameters;

- The kolab product series (i.e. kolab-2.4, kolab-3.0),
- The debian platform version (i.e. squeeze, wheezy),
- The repository stages (i.e. release, updates, updates-testing, development)

If "squeeze" maps to "stable" today, I reckon we'll need to change "stable" to 
"wheezy" by the time that is released - correct? Where would such a link be 
made (is it simply a ln -s squeeze stable in the dists/ directory of a 
repository mirror?)

Doesn't that make the effort quite the same, but exactly the inverse?

I mean, sticking with "stable" moves one forward "automatically" (I reckon a 
dist-upgrade is still required) when a new distribution version is labeled 
stable (I suppose one needs to change "stable" to "oldstable" to continue to 
use the same?), sticking with "squeeze" would cause a system to continue to 
use the same repositories (I suppose one needs to change "squeeze" to "wheezy" 
to upgrade).

While none of the former is set in stone exactly - I just thought it would 
work - I'd appreciate some thoughts on the subject from actual Debian 
users/sysadmins/developers;

- Is it necessary to maintain the release/updates/updates-testing/development 
repository stages at all?

- Would a default (i.e. the documented) installation better use "stable" and 
"testing" terminology, rather than "squeeze" and "wheezy"?

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

-- 
Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG

e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://www.kolabsys.com

pgp: 9342 BF08

_______________________________________________
Kolab-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlBIj8QACgkQKN6f2pNCvwiDqwCgyHMXR4t0Ep9F4HEeuf6FAJvR
DIIAoIvLcT33iRMwVk7siVzb3l05vmUS
=d36T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.