Re: CalDAV Collections vs. IMAP Folders

On Wednesday 27 March 2013 13.29:13 Thomas Brüderli wrote:
> Can we call this a final decision? Using a /vendor/kolab/name annotation
> for display names and take the full IMAP path as UID for *DAV collections?

When I spoke about this with Jeroen, he had a strong opinion on re-using the 
comment annotation, which otherwise has no use we were aware of.

It would have the benefitof not having to introduce yet another annotation, 
which also has a cost. We were driving at the time, so could not look up the 
actual definition of this annotation.

In particular we were not sure this annotation is used anywhere, by anyone, as 
adding a comment of "My spam box" for /INBOX/Spam seems to add very little, 
and we struggled to come up with sensible uses for the annotation ourselves.

If it turns out it is defined, but in fact not really used by anyone, using it 
for the symbolic name of the *DAV access would make a lot of sense.

Unfortunately Jeroen is on vacation right now, and he should have the last say 
on this. But if you need to start working on this now, I'd suggest to start 
with the comment annotation, as that exists and is not used for Kolab 
otherwise, and we change it to a private annotation later if we must.

Would that work for you?

Best regards,
Georg


-- 
Georg C. F. Greve
Chief Executive Officer

Kolab Systems AG				Make it your Kolab @ http://mykolab.com
Zürich, Switzerland				or try it out at http://kolabsys.com/try

e: [email protected]
t: +41 78 904 43 33
w: http://kolabsys.com

pgp: 86574ACA Georg C. F. Greve

_______________________________________________
Kolab-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAUVLsGik9sUy32wQcAQIupQP/UUErRg1w35fyoZQORQ2s0AnumBvlwQTm
pdl3xlQNp0ZpLEcRrQaDatfD09pjhHld2+YZJI05vqlLji2MRDQwnA3WCy13Z6l4
eBjRiCXhMrk/OjwvkrT5+stnhHOYAiIPxmWJLlq1C1hiUgY6LnCDOcorxwAxhlIF
zYt6ckxqvoo=
=hqaw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----