Re: [Kolab-devel] Kolab 3.1
Tormen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kolab |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <525551C9.2060809__24797.7212573916$1381323229$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Hi Torsten, >> Otherwise this is of no personal importance for me and I am a happy >> camper to get my kolab on Debian with one nice install command! > We would actually appreciate contributions, I do understand and think that is only fair! I am aware of the give + take principle in the Open-Source community and I like it and live it. Please see that I am new to kolab ... and until I get around to try it, not even sure that I'll like it ;) Once I am sure that I'll use and need it (and/or that kolab can successfully replace an Exchange server), then would be the time to contribute. > especially now since the process > for those is documented here: > > http://hosted.kolabsys.com/~vanmeeuwen/build/html/developer-guide/packaging/obs-for-kolab/howto-get-started.html > > There is so many distributions and we can not maintain packages for all of them. Isn't Debian still one of the big distros ... I would even say /the/ free distro that one should support after RHEL/CentOS ? (especially as Debian serves as mother distro for so many spin offs) But that's maybe too subjective :) On a 2nd thought about the 2 debian repos: Hence for Debian the two repos (base + update) provide an installable version only together, what is the point in separating them ? Wouldn't it maybe make more sense to just provide one debian repo ? (until you can provide a base repo being independent of an update repo) Best, Tormen.