Re: [Kolab-devel] Kolab 16 for Debian

Hello @all,

I'm glad to hear that Debian will be in the focus as one of the 
primary distributions in the future.

May be the main reason is, because some of the debian derivates are used 
on SBC like Raspi, Banana Pi, Odroid and so on like I do.

In the past I tried to install Winterfell on my Raspi but failed because 
of the dependencies of Guam and Erlang.

When I understand your other mail correctly, it is only used for filtering 
folders presented to the client.
May be to simple, but what about an IMAP Proxy? Sometimes I use an IMAP 
proxy for the web to improve performance because of many connections from 
the webserver to the IMAP server.

So I can give it another try to upgrade my version 3.4 to 16 in the "near 
future" :-)

Kind regards
Andreas
whvneo.blogspot.ch

On Sat, 29 Oct 2016, Timotheus Pokorra 
wrote:

> Hello developers of Kolab,
> 
> Looking again at what was said at the Kolab Summit 2.0 in June this year.
> http://www.pokorra.de/2016/06/videos-from-the-kolab-summit-2-0-with-some-minutes-taken/
> 
> quoting my notes:
> Operating System: Alternate: Debian, Ubuntu LTS; Docker+Kubernetes (as
> target platform). Aaron “expects one or more of these two to move from
> alternate up to primary in the not too distant future. Again, this is
> driven by demand and usage.”
> 
> I certainly think there is demand for a Debian version of Kolab 16. I
> hear that on the IRC.
> It seems to me that many of the community who are using Kolab at home
> are using Debian.
> We don't want to lose them. We need usage of Kolab, to find errors and issues.
> Some companies using Kolab on Debian are already switching to CentOS,
> which is fine. But I wonder if the private users will do that.
> 
> Question: do we have a plan for Kolab 16 on Debian?
> How do we count if there is enough demand?
> Is there a time plan?
> Do we need help from the community?
> Should we offer a slimmed down version of Kolab (without guam) if
> Erlang packaging is a problem? (I don't know if it is)
> Are there any known packaging problems of Kolab 16 for Debian? What is
> holding us back?
> 
> Looking forward to answers!
> 
> Timotheus
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/devel