Re: [Kolab-devel] Kolab 16 for Debian
Daniel Hoffend <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:19:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kolab |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20161130231911.GA9030@dotCarbon> |
Hi hede thanks for your answer, but I was more concerned about Jereons Call to get Kolab:16 for Debian tested and fixed. Therefore I was looking around what has changed in the last half year. In the end there hasn't changed much to be fair :-) Especially not the laggy OBS :-) I really haven't missed it. In the mean time I've already fixed couple packages in Kolab:16 and Winterfell which are already pushed through and live. At least a default Debian Installation should now go through without any major drawbacks. But there's still some packages and components missing to be feature complete compared to the Centos Release. -- Regards Daniel On 2016-11-29 21:42, hede wrote: > Am Sun, 27 Nov 2016 09:30:37 +0100 schrieb Daniel Hoffend <[email protected]>: > > > What's the correct way to fix package bugs nowadays? Send patch requests to kolab16 in obs or winterfell or both or what? > > Good question. > > AFAIK there are 2 ways: > > 1: > - branch/fork the corresponding project/package in OBS[1] > - fix errors in your personal home project > - file a submit request to the upstream maintainer (within obs) > - the package maintainer will hopefully include your work > > [1] https://obs.kolabsys.com/ > > 2: Submit a patch in fabricator[2] > - create a task > - add your patch/diff to the task > - the upstream developer will hopefully include your work > > [2] https://git.kolab.org/ > > With way 1 you get your working packages in [3] (at least for AMD64). Incredibly handy for direct inclusion within some local kolab installation. With way 2 you'll better reach upstream developers. > > [3] http://obs.kolabsys.com:82/Kolab:/ > > regards > hede > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/devel