Re: Kopete & KF5

Pali Rohár <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kopete
Message-ID <201611111830.30896@pali>
On Friday 11 November 2016 18:03:49 R.Harish Navnit wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, 4ernov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2016-11-10 20:01 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár <[email protected]>:
> >> On Monday 07 November 2016 10:35:23 4ernov wrote:
> >>> 2016-11-07 12:15 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit
> >>> <[email protected]>:
> >>> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, 4ernov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >> Thanks, Harish. Actually we've discussed with Pali, which
> >>> >> protocols would be useful to be ported and those which are
> >>> >> more or less "alive" were ported. I think, the remaining
> >>> >> could be turned off for now, as
> >>> > 
> >>> > So the remaining are the ones written down in the INSTALL file,
> >>> > right ? I think it's important to document this somewhere. We
> >>> > can't expect a new comer to know these details.
> >>> > 
> >>> > So I just wanted to confirm that we haven't missed(or added any
> >>> > extras) any such protocols in the INSTALL file.
> >>> 
> >>> OK. At current state the following protocols remain unported
> >>> (fail to compile):
> >>> - yahoo
> >>> - sms
> >>> - skype
> >>> - qq
> >> 
> >> IIRC current version of qq is not working anymore.
> >> 
> >>> Following our previous discussion, they could be either turned
> >>> off by default or removed from the tree and CMake files
> >>> completely, if there's low chance they'd be used by anyone.
> >>> There's also IRC protocol, which I've ported as well,
> >> 
> >> IRC is broken and does not work on KDE4 version of Kopete. I would
> >> delete it from git after switching to KF5.
> >> 
> >>> but it fails to link for me for
> >>> unknown reason. Probably, there's something in terms of missing
> >>> moc files. Given that I saw some efforts on updating it here,
> >>> probably my work is a little out of date, so I didn't merge it
> >>> to "kf5".
> >> 
> >> Ok. So current code is in kf5 branch of main kopete repository. I
> >> believe other branches now contains old code and other personal
> >> cloned repositories too...
> > 
> > Yes, I just can confirm, that all my clones and other "kf5-*"
> > branches on official Kopete repository are out of date and "kf5"
> > branch contains my most recent commits. So probably it's most
> > up-to-date and complete in terms of KF5 porting.
> 
> So that's wonderful news. Maybe someone will need to review and test
> the changes in the KF5 branch and get them merged to master.

On reviewboard are some kde3-->kde4-->kf5 patches with unsolved issues: 
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/?show-closed=0

Do not know if those problems are already fixed in kf5 git branch or 
not, but such changes with open issues on reviewboard cannot be merged 
into master.

> There's an interesting discussion going on in the kde-devel ML's too
> btw, ICYMI : https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=147882011502219&w=2

Already read this and removal of kdepimlibs in this year can be really 
problematic!

But I believe we will have working kf5 port until end of next year...

-- 
Pali Rohár
[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlgmADYACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1KyXACgx/MMFPWTd+KqRU5CVKwQrJ9H
avkAnizSVC8RV/Bi0rqVBPZmnZMtaPqr
=mbQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.