Re: Kopete & KF5
Pali Rohár <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kopete |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201611111830.30896@pali> |
On Friday 11 November 2016 18:03:49 R.Harish Navnit wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, 4ernov <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2016-11-10 20:01 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár <[email protected]>: > >> On Monday 07 November 2016 10:35:23 4ernov wrote: > >>> 2016-11-07 12:15 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit > >>> <[email protected]>: > >>> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, 4ernov <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> Thanks, Harish. Actually we've discussed with Pali, which > >>> >> protocols would be useful to be ported and those which are > >>> >> more or less "alive" were ported. I think, the remaining > >>> >> could be turned off for now, as > >>> > > >>> > So the remaining are the ones written down in the INSTALL file, > >>> > right ? I think it's important to document this somewhere. We > >>> > can't expect a new comer to know these details. > >>> > > >>> > So I just wanted to confirm that we haven't missed(or added any > >>> > extras) any such protocols in the INSTALL file. > >>> > >>> OK. At current state the following protocols remain unported > >>> (fail to compile): > >>> - yahoo > >>> - sms > >>> - skype > >>> - qq > >> > >> IIRC current version of qq is not working anymore. > >> > >>> Following our previous discussion, they could be either turned > >>> off by default or removed from the tree and CMake files > >>> completely, if there's low chance they'd be used by anyone. > >>> There's also IRC protocol, which I've ported as well, > >> > >> IRC is broken and does not work on KDE4 version of Kopete. I would > >> delete it from git after switching to KF5. > >> > >>> but it fails to link for me for > >>> unknown reason. Probably, there's something in terms of missing > >>> moc files. Given that I saw some efforts on updating it here, > >>> probably my work is a little out of date, so I didn't merge it > >>> to "kf5". > >> > >> Ok. So current code is in kf5 branch of main kopete repository. I > >> believe other branches now contains old code and other personal > >> cloned repositories too... > > > > Yes, I just can confirm, that all my clones and other "kf5-*" > > branches on official Kopete repository are out of date and "kf5" > > branch contains my most recent commits. So probably it's most > > up-to-date and complete in terms of KF5 porting. > > So that's wonderful news. Maybe someone will need to review and test > the changes in the KF5 branch and get them merged to master. On reviewboard are some kde3-->kde4-->kf5 patches with unsolved issues: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/?show-closed=0 Do not know if those problems are already fixed in kf5 git branch or not, but such changes with open issues on reviewboard cannot be merged into master. > There's an interesting discussion going on in the kde-devel ML's too > btw, ICYMI : https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=147882011502219&w=2 Already read this and removal of kdepimlibs in this year can be really problematic! But I believe we will have working kf5 port until end of next year... -- Pali Rohár [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlgmADYACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1KyXACgx/MMFPWTd+KqRU5CVKwQrJ9H avkAnizSVC8RV/Bi0rqVBPZmnZMtaPqr =mbQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----