Links and my wishlist

Olivier Saraja <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kpovmodeler
Organization LinuxGraphic.Org
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

> > links features on my private home page on role playing games and that I
> > lack space. I'll give you shortly the new URL, and then the old ones
> > should be changed on the kpm homepage.
>
> Sure.

For the moment, only tutorial 01 should appear at the following URL:

http://www.linuxgraphic.org/section3d/kpovmodeler/tutorial01/index.html

A whole section dedicated to kpm will be set once I Have enough material for 
it, which is not yet the case. Once this specially dedicated section will be 
set, I suppose I'll change slightly the URLs again...

My third tutorial is available at: 

http://www.linuxgraphic.org/section3d/kpovmodeler/tutorial01/index.html

for ideas and comments. This URL should NOT be made public for the moment, as 
I still have plan about this tutorial. Let's say it's still in Beta version.

> On my wishlist, too :-)

cool to hear this :o)

> I think I stumbled over a library that can calculate csg results (don't
> have an url at hand). As long as csg results can't be calculated the
> shading preview will be useless. And don't expect this feature today and
> tomorrow morning. That's in the "long term" wishlist section (together with
> animations)

Too bad :o( but hey, I still have a cool tool in my hands!

> Are there nurbs objects in povray? At least not in the 3.1 version.

I'm not sure, I discovered Povray at the same time as kpm: I have no 
background in raytracers!

> Well, in theory you can insert any number of smooth triangles into a csg
> union to create a mesh object :-)
> It's planned in the near future!

Near future? Well, that's very very very cool: will there be tools to extrude, 
revolve et all. these triangles? This is not a feature linked to Povray, I 
guess, but to the modeler by itself that should be able to produce/generate 
the triangles compatible to povray with any proprietary inboard format kpm 
could have.


> The problem with all your csg ideas is that they would be only
> implementable for very simple objects. Imagine you want to round a truetype
> text object. No, I don't think this will ever be implemented.

Too bad. I suppose super ellipsoid an help a little in some circumstances...

> moment I am busy with the framework improvements. No idea what will be
> next.

Hey, I have a lot of features wishlist, if you mind ;o)

-- 
Amicalement,
Olivier Saraja
<http://www.linuxgraphic.org>
<http://www.blender-cafe.org>



List archive and information: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kpovmodeler-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.