Re: Libraries

I would say Luis and you should decide this, I don't know its current state.

But, if there are rough edges and library handling is not self-explanatory, we 
should disable it. There is no documentation at the moment, correct? And I 
don't think there's enough time for translators at this time.

On Tuesday, 13. July 2004 21:16, Leon Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Okay I've committed some further changes to the library handling. Theres
> still some rough edges, and its not all I would of hoped, I've been trying
> numerous approaches and things, and still can't get it to work perfectly.
> Its usable, just some graphical glitches, and occacsionally refuses to do
> things that it should allow. I've simply run out of time...
>
> So should I leave the drag and drop code active? or should we even disable
> libs altogether till it all works?
>
> I'm tempted to leave it all in, since it would add a very useful feature to
> KPM, but if we diable the libs, we could then change its internal working
> later without worrying about breaking any libs people have created. Plus we
> get to take advantage of any improvments KDE/Qt 4 may bring.
>
> What does everyone think?

-- 
--------------------------------------------------
 Andreas Zehender
 Master of Computer Science, Dipl. Ing. (BA)
 http://www.azweb.de
 [email protected] | [email protected]      
--------------------------------------------------

List archive and information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kpovmodeler-devel