Re: Libraries

On Tuesday 13 July 2004 20:35, Andreas Zehender wrote:
> I would say Luis and you should decide this, I don't know its current
> state.
>
> But, if there are rough edges and library handling is not self-explanatory,
> we should disable it. There is no documentation at the moment, correct? And
> I don't think there's enough time for translators at this time.

On Wednesday 14 July 2004 09:54, CARVALHO Luis Passos wrote:
> Hmmm. Since we don't have documentation and it's not fully stable, we
> should disable it. The only thing I hate more than a missing feature is a
> feature that doesn't always work.
>
> Maybe add a undocumented option to the config file saying if the library
> code is active or not, just so we can test it easily and provide previews
> for those who like bleeding edge?
>
> Regards,
> Luis

I'd call that a consensus so I've disabled it.

I've been ill today so I didn't have the time for anything other than doing 
the defines in pmshell.cpp, pmpart.cpp and pmsettingsdialog.cpp.

I think this and CSG could well be two new killer features for the next 
release, plus it also gives us time to do some premade libs, I think people 
would appreciate the materials being available as a library.

-- 
Leon Pennington

"If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day; if you 
teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime." 

List archive and information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kpovmodeler-devel