Re: Blackboard
Greg Copeland <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kpovmodeler |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 11:28, Andreas Zehender wrote: [snip] > > Skeletal Animation > > Doesn't this mean that some sort of additional constraint based system > > might also be required? For more information on this, there is an old > > modeler called Sced which was completely written around the concept of > > constraint based modeling/animation. Example, if I have two bones and > > one joint, I can independently move the two bones at it's joint, > > however, what constrains the joint's movement (e.g. I can't move my arm > > 360'). Also, what if the movement of the two bones are inherently tied > > together. That is, if one moves, so must the other (think of a scissor > > lift as an example) and then, only along certain axies. > > Well, I didn't think about animation support yet and will not do that within > the next weeks. My free time is limited at the moment. First priority is the > documentation, then the plugin api and then animation with basic scripting. > [snip] > > Collision Detection (CD) > > When I originally mentioned this, I envisioned the simplest of CD and > > allow for complex CD via scripting. Remember, since python is being > > used, it can pretty easily be extended via C or C++ which means even > > custom objects could be addressed via this type of CD approach. > > But imagine a csg that consists of a height field, a lathe and a polynom. I > would say a real, exact collision detection is impossible. Ouch. Point well taken! > > > POV-Ray Support [snip] > I think we should ask the user if a scene for an older povray version should > be converted and support only one version. At least that is the easiest way. > I have no problem with that. I was under the impression that support of some kind was being considered. I personally think supporting a specific version is the way to go. Greg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9MvtP4lr1bpbcL6kRAuXcAJ9pJZR8j165+jHlV/v1Yp9z75ByyACfeib8 p+LrW6MVpBgBnJOXTulT1rk= =tVPK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----