Re: Kolab Now vs Kolab groupware

Geoff Nordli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kroupware
Message-ID <78999753-542d-0141-dbcf-7731f0554a28__48966.2889902078$1578288023$gmane$org@gnaa.net>
Hi Mihai.

comments inline.


On 2020-01-05 1:47 a.m., MIhai Badici wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksander.
>>
>> I have been using Kolab as an e-mail server only.  Probably about 15 
>> years now with various installations for small businesses.  I keep 
>> circling back every few years hoping I can replace Exchange Server.
>>
>> I think it would help if there was a clients page like we used to 
>> have on the 2.x wiki.
>>
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20070516081516/http://www.kolab.org/about-kolab-clients.html 
>>
>>
>> If it could list the different clients people are using and what the 
>> expectations are.
>>
>> If people are having success with Outlook we should be shouting from 
>> the rooftops.
>>
>> I will even volunteer to write it up.  If people can send me what 
>> they have working, then I will put it in a document and we can post 
>> it somewhere.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Geoff
>
> Hello Geoff
>
> I will wrote few words about "replacing Exchange Server" from my 
> experience. I joined this project with similar ideas ( in fact I first 
> started to build my own ldap-centric project because i wasn't aware of 
> kolab )
>
> Replacing Exchange with ... exchange is neither an easy task :) I 
> recently migrated from 2007 to 2013 ( because there is no path to 
> migrate directly to 2016) and I had enough troubles to postpone the 
> migration to the current version few months in order to allow the 
> situation to stabilize( for example i discovered they used a public 
> folder and this feature was removed in next versions). There are a lot 
> of changes in exchange and outlook and the compatibility between 
> versions is poor.
>
> Now, about mail client:
>
> IMHO in a corporate environment is nearly impossible to remove 
> outlook. Even if you will find a better client, you will find someday 
> a stupid feature who is missing. But the real problem is to deploy the 
> client. Thunderbird work pretty well and it has plugins for each 
> feature you want. But can we deploy the plugins via group policy? 
> Never tried but it will be tough. And you will deploy Outlook anyway, 
> because you cannot avoid MsOffice. A corporation  without powerpoint 
> is not a corporation, without powerpoint people will be forced to 
> work  :)

Yes, for most corporations they need Outlook.  I work for small business 
clients (<25 desktops).   Sometimes it is possible to get away from 
Outlook and use Thunderbird.  They just want e-mail to work.  Their Line 
of business apps don't require the use of Outlook.

>
> So there is only Outlook you can consider. I made some tests with 
> Outlook2010 in the past and seems to work well with ActiveSync. But I 
> didn't use it daily. Also there are plugins for caldav if you want to 
> use it with IMAP (here there is the same problem , you will need to 
> configure them one by one because the autoconfiguration is only about 
> the e-mail account). The newest versions of outlook are dificult to be 
> configured manually, I don't know, for example, how to force it to use 
> ActiveSync instead of IMAP via autoconf. The big pain here is the IMAP 
> implementation on Outlook is not always work flawless but it looks it 
> was improved in newest version.

I wonder how motivated MS is to make IMAP work well.  It seems it would 
be to their disadvantage for it to be flawless.

I find the manual configuration of a client to not be a show stopper.  
If it takes me 5 extra minutes to configure a client, that is not a big 
deal.

>
> Now, about the features:
>
>  I had a HTC corporate smartphone around 2008 running windows CE and 
> outlook. This years having ActiveSync with contacts and calendar was 
> "THE BIG THING". Everybody want it and I installed a lot of Windows 
> SBS with exchange precisely for this feature.
>
> Nowadays people with android smartphones are more or less forced to 
> use a google account and will syncronize the contacts with this one. 
> The big advantage is when you leave the company you will go with the 
> contacts, which is an unwrited  law among corporate people :)  .  I 
> have enough installs of kolab servers with ActiveSync working well but 
> I know maybe two people who really use the address book.

The one client I have just uses IMAP with their phones to connect.  That 
seems to be working well enough for them.  I assume the caldav/cardav 
sync should be more than enough.

>
> There is still the global agenda which is more or less useful. But the 
> only install I had where the global agenda was maintained properly ( 
> with phone numbers, at least, maybe photos) was one where I used 
> openldap on linux and I made a small "site" where the HR department 
> can  upload/change those data. Here Active Directory is not an example 
> at all. I don't know HR people willing to use the AD MMC and you 
> cannot maintain GAL with IT department. Here we can do more with kolab :)

>
> The only important thing remaining seems to be the calendar. I use 
> dovecot for IMAP where seems to be difficult to use shared contacts or 
> calendars but in fact nobody want to manage multiple calendars. You 
> receive an invite and add it to your calendar. If you have an working 
> calendar ( with iRony on desktop and ActiveSync on mobile) will be 
> great and in fact it works. Having shared calendars for objects ( 
> conference rooms, cars, demo devices) will be also great and I think 
> it works with kolab ( i can't do it with dovecot)

Isn't Cyrus the only option?  When I look at other mail projects they 
are either using Sogo or Nextcloud for calendaring.  I think part of the 
benefit of Kolab is having Contacts/Calendars built right into the mail 
server.   Are you thinking different?


>
> Now, I think the most used new feature in Exchange is "skype for 
> business" . There is no big integration deal ( just having the same 
> account) but group calls are more and more popular.  Here you will 
> need a solution if you want to replace Exchange. I spent lot of time 
> triyng to use ejabberd or openfire for xmpp but it look this is a dead 
> end . Probably using mattermost is the right way to do it. I used for 
> 2-3 years for a 20 users company RocketChat as conference solution. 
> This is a sort of "hipster-driven" server, their ldap implementation 
> is rather hilarious ( it need periodic sincronization, sort of offline 
> sync) and I was loosing the chat history at nearly every upgrade   but 
> peoples where rather happy with this apps, working either from browser 
> or using a client .

OK, I wasn't even thinking about conferencing.  One client that wants 
chat I use Openfire and Jitsi.  I am not thinking conferencing is that 
big of a deal.  Is RocketChat the default conferencing engine for 
Nextcloud?  I see that Nextcloud has a "talk/text/video" feature.  I 
haven't checked it out yet.

>
> There are also some "small things" who can become more important than 
> the "big ones". You can't use "sieve filters" with outlook. When using 
> Exchange ( or any other groupware) you will need to create filtering 
> rules on the server. ATM, you can do that only using roundcube. There 
> is a sieve plugin for thunderbird but it require sieve syntax 
> knowledge so it is unusable anyway. The most stupid missing feature is 
> the ability to set vacation messages ( you can do it from roundcube 
> because it is a sieve filter too but nobody will search for this 
> feature in the "filters" tab). One of my most successful solution was 
> to rename this tab "autoresponder and filters" :)  Anyway , we will 
> need an user friendly sieve outlook (and thunderbird)  plugin .

yes, that is a pain.  If people are doing an OOF, they actually contact 
me and I do it for them.  It is not ideal.



>
> As I said, Microsoft removed the "public folders" feature in Exchange. 
> It was, indeed, a wrong way to use file sharing. That's why I prefer 
> to use the owncloud integration: sharing files is a different thing, 
> there are different product implementing it; but is nice to have the 
> possibility to attach those files. I have webdav owncloud implemented 
> for one customer, it works pretty well now but is not so popular. But 
> maybe for larger companies could be useful.

I am not deploying nextcloud for the few clients that needs file 
sharing.  It seems to be working well.


>
>
> Well, it was pretty long. Maybe I missed things but the fact is the 
> major issues are solved but the devil is in the details..
>
> Mihai


The devil is always in the details that is why we need to have a public 
discussion on what is working and what isn't working. If you set proper 
expectations then people are happy.

I put together a document: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UtZXATe_qRw1UJWluT9ABq6hkd4OcoBf33bjZ7o6sXc/edit?usp=sharing

I am hoping we can expand on this and offer some configuration options too.

Geoff



_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.