Re: New mailing list and online documentation
Lennart <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:43:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kroupware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0102017fa75a520e-13ed362a-a32c-4653-9c65-0649e4a4e811-000000__47091.5503263072$1647780245$gmane$org@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> |
Hi Mike, Sruli asked a similar question on the other list: http://kolab.dlnet.org/listserver/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/thread/2PVVAWT7SFK77JICUDIHQL5DFNST32NX/ In summary: Apheleia IT has a bunch of developers that are still working on the Kolab code and publishing on git.kolab.org. (They probably own the rights of the name "Kolab" as well.) Since there are few community developers, it makes more sense to stay close to the official project. Unfortunately Apheleia IT seems less keen to engage with the community, so we have to improvise. Best, Lennart On 19-03-2022 15:20, Mike Gabriel wrote: > HI Lennart, > > On Di 08 Mär 2022 15:07:11 CET, Lennart wrote: > >> Dear Kolab community, >> >> Since a while ago the online docs have not been updated (T6055 >> <https://git.kolab.org/T6055>) and the mailing list web site has been >> down (T6220 <https://git.kolab.org/T6220>). It does not look like >> Apheleia IT (the company that now runs Kolab) is interested in fixing >> this. Hence, it might be time to take matters in our own hands. >> >> I have uploaded the latest git version of the documentation to >> kolab.dlnet.org/docs <http://kolab.dlnet.org/docs/>. >> >> I started a new users mailing list that can be found here: >> kolab.dlnet.org/listserver <https://kolab.dlnet.org/listserver/>. >> >> Of course to revive the community much more would need to be done. I >> don't have much time to contribute substantially, but I hope that >> providing these vital services can be a starting point. Please let me >> know what you think. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Lennart > > Thanks for the initiative. Would it make sense to move the whole > project's code to gitlab.com or some such? > > If a project becomes unmaintained over time and people gather > somewhere else to ensure continuation of maintenance, I guess this > would not be a fork then technically. The original maintainers will be > welcome to continue their contributions, just at another place? Hmmm... > > Mike _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users