D16228: Raise window group together with group transient

Martin Flöser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
graesslin added a comment.


  In D16228#353813 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16228#353813>, @zzag wrote:
  
  > In D16228#353706 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16228#353706>, @graesslin wrote:
  >
  > > Now I have a question: what is a real-world example for a group transient?
  >
  >
  > Relevant mailing list thread:
  >
  > - https://mail.gnome.org/archives/wm-spec-list/2002-December/msg00020.html
  >
  >   As an example, each desktop effect KCM dialog is a group transient (probably, because we don't set parent).
  
  
  No they are not. They don't have a transient parent, it's just that the EWMH evaluates that to be group transients. But that's in that case wrong. It's just a window without a parent.
  
  > This patch tries to put "group transients" on par with transients for toplevel windows. If user raises a transient for a toplevel window, its main windows will be raised too. Why should it be different case for "group transients"?
  
  I would say: don't fix what is not broken. I'm afraid of side effects if we change such old code. I'm probably not the only one who hasn't known that transient for has such a behavior if set to root and I maintained a large window manager for almost a decade. Chances are that if we change the code it will cause regressions as applications break.
  
  If you present me a real world use case where this feature is used and our current behavior is broken I might consider such a change. But without a real world use case I would say it's an obscure feature of ewmh which nobody uses any more

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16228

To: zzag, #kwin, graesslin
Cc: graesslin, davidedmundson, kwin, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, Pitel, iodelay, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.