D22277: Save Compositor state in single variable

Roman Gilg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
romangg added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> zzag wrote in composite.cpp:174
> No, we still need m_finished to delay deletion of support properties, don't we?

True. Having a member variable just for that looks like bad design to me in the first place but alright. What I would like to get rid of also is this `isTerminating` check in the beginning.

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D22277

To: romangg, #kwin
Cc: zzag, kwin, LeGast00n, sbergeron, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, Pitel, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.