D27682: Port kwinrules kcm to kconfigxt
Kevin Ottens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ervin requested changes to this revision. ervin added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. Minor things now (the one about the enum can be ignored of course). INLINE COMMENTS > ervin wrote in ruleslist.cpp:32 > I don't think this is doing what you expect, you didn't declare m_settings as a pointer. I wonder if that couldn't even lead to a double delete... might not be the case a bit by chance (since children are cleaned-up in QObject dtor the KCMRulesList part of the object (including the m_settings member are long gone). Cheer luck ;-) I still think this should be switched to using a pointer, or if not the this should be dropped as parameter. > rules.h:104 > Rules(); > - explicit Rules(const KConfigGroup&); > + explicit Rules(const RuleSettings*); > Rules(const QString&, bool temporary); Can drop the const now > rules.h:135 > + UnusedSetRule = Unused, > + SetRuleDummy = 256 // so that it's at least short int > + }; Might be worth testing without it, since C++11 this should be guaranteed to be an int anyway. REPOSITORY R108 KWin REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27682 To: hchain, meven, crossi, bport, ervin, #kwin Cc: iasensio, ognarb, zzag, kwin, Orage, cacarry, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, romangg, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart