Re: Search and replace help
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwrite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2652750.BEx9A2HvPv@unknown0090f5ef9f13> |
On Dienstag, 25. Mai 2021 21:12:15 CEST Kåre Särs wrote: > Hello Spiro, > > On tisdag 25 maj 2021 kl. 12:50:38 EEST S T wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been looking through forums and mailing lists but couldn't find a > > solution, so I am trying here. When using "search and replace" plugin it > > used to output found files (text) with paths relative to projects folder. > > Now, after a computer reboot it shows paths as absolute. It used to be: > > 6.439 matches (6.439 checked) found in project Ticket_3080 > > (C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/) > > /Ticket_3080/Ticket_3080.txt: 34 > > /Ticket_3080/Ticket_3080.txt.bak: 34 > > /Ticket_3080/blade_00/main/configurationViewer/Overview.txt: 90 > > /Ticket_3080/blade_00/main/managedObject/mom-dump.txt: 90 > > ... > > And now it looks like this: > > 6.439 matches (6.439 checked) found in project Ticket_3080 > > (C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/) > > /C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - > > spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/Ticket_3080.txt: 34 > > /C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - > > spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/Ticket_3080.txt.bak: 34 > > /C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - > > spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/blade_00/main/configurationViewer/ > > O > > verview.txt: 90 /C:/Users/spiro/OneDrive - > > spiro/Ticket_handling/JIRAs/Ticket_3080/blade_00/main/managedObject/mom-du > > m > > p.txt: 90 ... > > In order to view the results, I need to stretch search and replace sidebar > > to half the screen. It is the same for "project" search as well as "open > > files", "current file" search. > > For Kate 21.04 the search plugin went through a reworking of how the results > are gathered and displayed together with the speed optimization. > > The file path has indeed changed from relative to the project/search folder > to absolute... I don't remember this being intentional, but I would like to > hear opinions from the team: Should we go back to removing the common path? Not quite sure, maybe it was me who removed the common part of the path from the results a few years ago, to save horizontal space and avoid repeating the same parent dir in every line. So, unsurprisingly, I still prefer the shorter version. Alex