Re: How can i make kate behaviour go back to normal?

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:16:50 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwrite
Message-ID <2266653.ElGaqSPkdT@breq>
[Please reply inline instead of TOFU. It makes following an argument much 
easier and it makes it much easier to remove irrelevant context from a reply.]

On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2022 11:58:03 CET Waqar Ahmed wrote:
> Can you explain why this is worse UX?

Not using a separate dialog isn't a viable solution for many KDE applications. 
By making Kate differ from other applications you confront the users with 
different concepts which is against KDE's goal to present a common user 
experience across all applications (unless there are good reasons to derive 
from the common UX).

> This is an improvement, as it allows you to change settings without
> reopening the dialog every time.

This could have been solved easily by making the settings dialog not-modal 
(like in Kleopatra and probably many other applications).

> It also makes tweaking the theme and
> editor settings a lot more pleasant which was just a crappy experience in
> the past.

I'm wondering what this has to do with the settings being presented in a 
dialog or embedded in the main window.

Regards,
Ingo
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCY5W8IgAKCRCxb1mVFkdK
urJ7AQDris/9jZbPXyl/PI0r1WFPi7kUrICEqVVFlcRZTAfI7wD+N9ePmevwcs94
7ymB9C6KXZ4xOYqFaoupndSc4/+d9wc=
=HHQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----