Re: Reimplementing trivial apps as dcop services
George Staikos <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:44:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.optimize |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 02 April 2005 19:21, Luke Alan Sandell wrote: > There is a variety of command-line apps which are meant mainly for use in > shell scripts and which work by calling their corresponding kdelibs > functions. We have kdialog, kcolorchooser (which should arguably be a part > of kdialog for consistency purposes) and kprinter. Since each of these must > be dynamically linked to libkdecore (and initialize all its global objects) > as well as create their own instance of KApplication, they are extremely > slow. On my 300 MHz, it takes up to 4 secs to do a simple 'kdialog --msgbox > hello'. However, I found that the 'dcop' command for invoking dcop > functions is extremely fast, and so it dawned upon me to simply create dcop > services for all these commands (which I have stated to do). For instance, > I now type 'dcop myservice dialogs messageBox hello' and this only takes > about .5 secs. The first time you execute it, it will be slow though. > Of course, the actual command-line utilities could be rewritten as shell > scripts that call 'dcop' based on the command-line arguments passed to > them. Also, we don't want all these random dcop services sitting around in > the process list, so they should probably be integrated into kded. I was > wondering if this all makes sense, and if should I continue with it... No, they should die over time (unused) to avoid bloating memory. Also putting them in kded will just further propagate problems with system-wide deadlock (ex: #103184) -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/