Re: KIconLoader improvements: icon server

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 15:33, Gustavo Pichorim Boiko wrote:
...
> I have been playing with it and it is quite stable. I have some results (I
> didn't measure memory usage yet, just time for loading icons) that I want
> you to take a look:
>
> test1: 369 icons (32x32)
> w/o disk cache: 3628 ms
> cached: 361 ms
> iconserver: 74 ms
> ------------------------
> test2: 222 icons (48x48)
> w/o disk cache: 2262 ms
> cached: 322 ms
> iconserver: 35ms
> ------------------------
> test3: 774 icons (32x32)
> w/o disk cache: 4974 ms
> cached: 1170 ms
> iconserver: 709 ms

This looks good.
Ratio cached/iconserver:

222 icons: 322/35 = 9.2
369 icons: 361/74 = 4.9
774 icons: 1170/709 = 1.6

Any idea why the advantage seems to become significantly smaller with more 
icons ?

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: [email protected] - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: [email protected]                - http://www.kde.org
      [email protected]               - http://www.neundorf.net