Re: qobject_cast

On Saturday 12 November 2005 11.18, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hello.
>
> When browsing the kdelibs code, i seen sometimes in the code few
> qobject_cast when i would used dynamic_cast
>
> So my question was, what's the difference between qobject_cast and
> dynamic_cast ?
>
> After having doing some test, it seems that qobject_cast is 3 times faster
> than dynamic_cast.
>
> So I'll change my habit, and use qobject_cast instead of dynamic_cast when
> casting objects.
>
> Of course, I must continue to use static_cast which is still 10 times
> faster than qobject_cast when i know what my object is.

The question is - how do you know this for sure in real applications.
(could be true now, but what about early next year)
A test on a member variable (enum), or?
How much time would such an test add to the static_cast case?
(higher optimization levels will probably move that test out of the loop)

>
>
> The attached test, compiled with -O2
> no cast: 11 ms
> static_cast: 19ms   ratio: 1.72727
> dynamic_cast: 872ms   ratio: 79.2727
> qobject_cast: 290ms   ratio: 26.3636   dynamic ratio :3.0069
>
> note that when i compile with -O0 ,  static_cast is faster than no cast,
> strange.