Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] libkdeinit symbol pruning
Karl Vogel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.optimize |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maks Orlovich wrote: > On Tuesday 20 July 2004 08:09 pm, Karl Vogel wrote: >> David Faure wrote: >> > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- >> > >> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] libkdeinit symbol pruning >> > Date: Tuesday 20 July 2004 21:30 >> > From: Stephan Kulow <[email protected]> >> > To: David Faure <[email protected]> >> > >> > That am_edit patch is broken, the unsermake patch should work :) >> > >> > Greetings, Stephan >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Great! But I'm wondering what the problem with the am_edit patch was >> then?! >> >> >> Anyway.. more goodies.. I just finished testing the GCC visibility patch >> on QT (gcc 3.4): > > > <snip excellent work> > If I recall correctly, Qt also uses a version script, doesn't it? Not that I'm aware off.. don't see anything special in mkspecs/linux-g++ Also note that a version script doesn't have the improvement in code generation. Gcc will still generate the jumps through a PLT since it doesn't know whether the symbol is going to be pruned or not.